Model Comparison

Compare AI video models before you generate

Different video models are better at different jobs. Use this hub to decide when speed, realism, camera control, character consistency, or prompt following matters most.

Jimeng 3.0 for fast creative iteration and text/image workflowsHailuo 2.3 and Hailuo 2.3 Fast for text or image-led generationTomato Agent for reference-led videos and longer supported durations
01SpeedFast draft
02ControlDirected output
03Motion qualityQuality test

Test speed, control, and motion quality on the same brief

A useful comparison starts with the job: input type, motion quality, speed, consistency, and iteration cost.

01

Jimeng 3.0 for fast creative iteration and text/image workflows

Model names matter less than the result. Compare motion quality, prompt following, consistency, speed, and cost before committing to a larger batch.

Best for first-pass evaluation
02

Hailuo 2.3 and Hailuo 2.3 Fast for text or image-led generation

Use the same subject, motion, duration, aspect ratio, and quality target so differences in prompt following, stability, speed, and cost are easier to judge.

Best for production control
03

Tomato Agent for reference-led videos and longer supported durations

A fast draft model can help explore direction, while a more controlled workflow may be better for approved images, character continuity, or final campaign shots.

Best for final selection

Choose the right path for your next video

01

Jimeng 3.0 for fast creative iteration and text/image workflows

Model names matter less than the result. Compare motion quality, prompt following, consistency, speed, and cost before committing to a larger batch.

02

Hailuo 2.3 and Hailuo 2.3 Fast for text or image-led generation

Use the same subject, motion, duration, aspect ratio, and quality target so differences in prompt following, stability, speed, and cost are easier to judge.

03

Tomato Agent for reference-led videos and longer supported durations

A fast draft model can help explore direction, while a more controlled workflow may be better for approved images, character continuity, or final campaign shots.

A fair model test prompt

Run the same subject, camera move, duration, aspect ratio, and visual style across models. Compare motion quality, prompt following, stability, and generation speed.

Interactive starting point

Choose a model by production priority

Select what matters most and open the generator with a matching test prompt.
1Top priority
2Starting input
3Test type
Try a model

Create a usable AI video in three steps

  1. 01

    Start with the output type: text, image, first frame, or concept test.

  2. 02

    Choose the model strength that fits the scene.

  3. 03

    Generate a small batch and compare the results before scaling.

Common questions

Which AI video model is best?

There is no single best model. The best choice depends on prompt type, motion quality, style, speed, and consistency needs.

Can I compare models in one place?

Tomato AI is designed as a multi-model workflow so creators can test model strengths without switching platforms.

How should I compare AI video models?

Keep the prompt, source image, duration, ratio, and evaluation criteria as consistent as possible, then compare motion, stability, speed, and cost.